DOW-UAP-D117, AAWSAP DIRD, Metallic Glasses for Aerospace Applications, December 2009

53
⬇ Download HD (37.5 MB)
SHARE Reddit X Facebook HN Email
Agency
DoD
Category
military
Type
PDF
Event Date
12/14/2009
Size
37.5 MB
Original Filename
DOW-UAP-D117_AAWSAP-DIRD-Metallic-Glasses-for-Aerospace-Applications-December-14-2009.pdf
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
Status
REDACTED

This document is a Defense Intelligence Reference Document (DIRD), a technical reference format used by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to capture baseline knowledge on a specific topic for later analytic use. DIRDs are best understood as reference and synthesis products rather than as original research. It is one of 38 DIRDs produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP) between 2009 and 2011. Because AAWSAP’s scope permitted a broad range of supporting topics, not every DIRD in the series directly concerns aerospace systems or future threat assessment. The following summary reflects the DIRD’s scope and framing at the time of writing and should not be read as implying current validation of the concepts discussed. This DIRD surveys metallic glasses as a potentially important class of aerospace materials and describes their amorphous structure as offering very high strength and unusual manufacturing advantages, but also significant drawbacks, especially poor ductility and fatigue resistance. The document concludes that the most promising aerospace applications are likely to come from metallic-glass-matrix composites rather than single-phase glasses, because these composites can retain high strength while greatly improving fracture toughness and fatigue performance, potentially enough to substitute for high-strength steels in some space-limited structural uses. At the same time, the report judges that broader aerospace use will depend on substantial progress over the next 20–50 years in alloy design, processing, and especially the development of lightweight systems, including aluminum-based options.

The summary above is sourced from the released file metadata as published to war.gov. The analysis sections below are original to this tracker.

Text of the document

Machine-extracted from the PDF war.gov published (its text layer or OCR), so expect errors, especially in names, numbers and handwriting; the PDF is the authoritative copy. Lines that did not extract as readable text are left out. Showing about 999 words from pages 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 of 30.

PAGE 2

Metallic Glasses: Status and Prospects for Aerospace Prepared by: Acquisition Support Division (DWO-3) Defense Warning Office Directorate for Analysis Defense Intelligence Agency AAP Person 63 Administrative Note COPYRIGHT WARNlNG: Further dissemination of the photographs in this publication is not authorized. This product is one in a series of advanced technology reports produced in FY 2009 under the Defense Intelligence Agency, Defense Warning Office's Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program. Comments or 1uestions pertaining to this document should be addressed to!AAP Person 1 , AAWSA Program Manager, Defense Intelligence Agency, ATTN: CLAR/DWO-3, Bldg 6000, Washington,

PAGE 3

Metallic Glasses...................................................................................................... 1 Glass-Forming Alloys...................................................................................... 2 Casting and Molding ....................................................................................... 4 Thin Films and Coatings ................................................................................. 5 Mechanical Behavior Near Room Temperature ............................................... 5 Stiffness: Elastic Deformation ........................................................................ 6 Strength and Ductility: Plastic Deformation ................................................... 6 Fracture Toughness........................................................................................ 8 Wear Resistance........................................................................................... 10 Corrosion and Stress-Corrosion Cracking ..................................................... 10 Mechanical Behavior at Elevated Temperature ............................................. 11 Other Properties: Magnetic, Electrical, Optical, Thermal, and Acoustic ........ 12 Metallic Glass Matrix Composites ......................................................................... 13 Processing and Structure of Composites .......................................................... 13 Ex Situ Composites........................................................................................... 14 In Situ Composites........................................................................................... 14 Mechanical Properties of Composites ............................................................... 15 Strength and Ductility: Plastic Deformation ..................................................... 16 Fracture and Fatigue ........................................................................................ 16 Aerospace Applications of Metallic Glasses .......................................................... 16 Other Applications............................................................................................ 19

PAGE 4

Current Challenges and Prospects for the Future ................................................. 20 Thermophysical Properties and Thermoplastic Processing ............................... 20 Composites and the Quest for Ductility ............................................................... 21 Summary and Recommendations ......................................................................... 22 3. Examples of Processing of Metallic Glasses........................................................ 4 5. Fatigue Limit of Metallic-Glass-Matrix Composites ........................................... 10 6. Deformation Map for a Metallic Glasses............................................................ 11 8. Microstructure of In Situ Metallic Glass Matrix Composite................................ 15 9. Materials Property Charts................................................................................. 18 1. Selected Bulk Glass-Forming Alloys.................................................................... 3 2. Comparison of Strengths of Amorphous and Crystalline Aluminum Alloys ......... 7

PAGE 5

Metallic Glasses: Status and Prospects for Aerospace Metallic glasses combine some of the advantageous mechanical properties of metals-strength, stiffness, and in some cases toughness-with the processing flexibility usually associated with thermoplastic polymers. The absence of crystalline defects allows metallic glasses to be much stronger than conventional alloys but also means they have near-zero tensile ductility and poor fatigue resistance. In structural applications, therefore, metallic glasses are most likely to be useful in the form of composites consisting of ductile crystalline dendrites in a metallic glass matrix. These dendritic composites sacrifice some strength but can have exceptionally high fracture toughness, as well as good fatigue resistance, and could replace high-strength steels in certain load-limited structural components in aerospace vehicles where space is limited. Because they are true glasses, thermoplastic forming near the glass transition temperature affords metallic glasses tremendous flexibility in processi'ng. For instance, metallic glass components can be formed in a single step (for example, by injection molding) in complex geometries that would be difficult or impossible to produce with conventional alloys. In addition, metallic glass foams can be made with relative ease, raising the possibility of making structural foams with high strength and stiffness. Finally, because they lack a crystalline grain structure, metallic glasses can be used to form nanoscale features with high fide ity. This may make metallic glasses useful in a variety of micro-electromechanical systems (MEMS) applications. Metallic glasses also have significant limitations for aerospace applications, however. Foremost among these is a lack of good glass-forming alloys; in particular, there are no good aluminum-rich glass-forming alloys, the known titanium-based alloys are either relatively dense (owing to high concentrations of alloying elements) or contain beryllium, and the known magnesium- and iron-based alloys are all quite brittle, with low fracture toughness. Although metallic glass matrix composites can have outstanding properties (particularly strength and fracture toughness), the number of good composite systems known at present is also quite limited. Therefore, in order for metallic glasses (and their composites) to be of broad utility in aerospace structural applications, progress in the following areas is • Development of new lightweight alloys and composite systems, preferably by computational and/or combinatorial approaches rather than by trial and • Understanding of mechanical behavior, especially:

PAGE 6

□The effect of alloy composition and structure on plastic deformation. - 0Microstructural design of composites for optimal toughness. • Development of processing techniques, including thermophysical processing of complex and/or nanoscale features as well as production of metallic glass foams. It is highly likely that continued work over the next 20-50 years will result in significant advances in all these areas, and that metallic glasses and metallic glass matrix composites will see increasing acceptance as structural materials. Whether or not they achieve widespread use in aerospace applications, however, depends critically on the development of new, lightweight alloys.

PAGE 7

Metallic Glasses The atomic-scale structure of most metals and alloys is crystalline; that is, the atoms are arranged in a highly ordered manner on a lattice that is periodic in three dimensions, as depicted in Figure l(a). In contrast to this crystalline structure, metallic glasses lack the long-range order of a lattice and are therefore said to be amorphous, as depicted in Figure l(b) . Although the word "amorphous" implies a complete lack of structural order, in fact the atomic structure of metallic glasses is not truly random. Constraints on atomic packing provide strong short-range order; for instance, on average the atoms have a particular number of nearest atomic neighbors at a well­ defined distance. But this short-range order persists only over distances of a few atoms; there is no long-range order as there is in a crystalline alloy. In many ways, the atomic-scale structure of metallic glasses more closely resembles the highly disordered structure of a liquid than the structure of a crystalline alloy. Cry ta ll in Amorph u (gla s) Figure 1, Amorphous Versus Crystalline Structure. Schematic atomic-scale structure of crystalline (a) and amorphous (b) metals. In a crystalline structure, order persists over long distances (many atomic dimensions}. In a glass, there is short range order but no long-range order. A corollary of this difference in structure is that the nature of structural defects is quite different between crystalline and amorphous alloys. Crystalline alloys, for example,

Where this file fits in the PURSUE archive

This file is one of DoD's 282 files in the Trump PURSUE disclosure. Within the DoD agency block it ranks #233 of 282 by Anomalousness Index. Across the entire 478-file archive it ranks #408 of 478.

That places it in the lower-scoring band of the archive (408 of 478 by score), typical of investigative-record style files where the report is paper-based rather than instrumented.

Anomalousness Index: 53/100

This is a reference document, not an encounter report, so the index has no encounter to measure here. The value above is the rubric's default for a document that describes no event, shown so every file in the archive can be ranked the same way. Not a probability of extraterrestrial origin - that number is not honestly computable from the released files and this tracker refuses to publish it.

🤖 AI-ASSISTED SCORING · methodology

The six rubric components break down for this file as follows. Each component has a weighted contribution to the final score; the per-component explanation below describes what this file's particular value on that component means in the rubric's framework.

sensor quality (eyewitness only) 30 × 0.25 = 7.5

This file is a reference document, not an observation, so no sensor, camera, or witness captured anything. The rubric's sensor axis has no not-applicable option, so a document with no instrument record sits on its lowest tier by default.

witness credibility (military personnel) 80 × 0.2 = 16.0

There is no witness: this is a document released by the Department of War, not a first-hand account. The rubric assigns this axis from the originating body, so the value reflects the source of the record, not anyone's testimony.

corroboration (single witness instrument) 60 × 0.2 = 12.0

Nothing is being corroborated, because the file does not report an event. Like every file in the archive it takes the rubric's single-source default.

kinematic anomaly (no kinematic data) 30 × 0.15 = 4.5

The file describes no object and no motion, so the kinematic axis takes the archive-wide 'no kinematic data' default.

mundane explanation available (weak mundane candidate) 70 × 0.1 = 7.0

Every file in the archive scores this tier. For a document that describes no event it carries no information about the record at all.

official disposition (unresolved no review) 60 × 0.1 = 6.0

The rubric's default for the file's release status (files released with redactions are catalogued as unresolved, unredacted ones as open). For a document that reports no event this describes how the file was released, not anything that happened.

Bottom line on the score: the 53/100 is the rubric's default for a document that reports no encounter, so it is not a finding about any event and should not be compared with the scores of sighting reports. For the full per-axis weights and the rubric JSON, see /methodology.

Related files in DoD

Other PURSUE files in the same category, ranked by Anomalousness Index.

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR024, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2023

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR072, "ADMINISTRATIVE REVISION: IIR 1777 J0032 22 Kazakhstan - UAP in the vicinit…

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR106, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2020

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR108, Unresolved UAP Report, Western United States, 2020

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR109, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2015

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR110, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2020

BROWSE ALL 478 FILES →

Verification

SHA-256:

e773fe838b690aab4ce30feb3e431bbeb84e152f4420e8c75a0685f61a9351a2

This hash is the SHA-256 of the file body war.gov served on the verification date above. War.gov has re-processed some file bodies since first release (re-compression + OCR, no content removed - see /changes); we re-verify and record the change rather than silently serve a stale hash. How to check this yourself →

Source: https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/sept-18/release-06/assets/DOW-UAP-D117_AAWSAP-DIRD-Metallic-Glasses-for-Aerospace-Applications-December-14-2009.pdf

📡 Subscribe via RSS 🔔 Watch on GitHub