DOW-UAP-D118, AAWSAP DIRD, Aerospace Applications of Programmable Matter, December 2009

53
⬇ Download HD (9.4 MB)
SHARE Reddit X Facebook HN Email
Agency
DoD
Category
military
Type
PDF
Event Date
12/14/2009
Size
9.4 MB
Original Filename
DOW-UAP-D118_AAWSAP-DIRD-Aerospace-Applications-of-Programmable-Matter-December-14-2009.pdf
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
Status
REDACTED

This document is a Defense Intelligence Reference Document (DIRD), a technical reference format used by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to capture baseline knowledge on a specific topic for later analytic use. DIRDs are best understood as reference and synthesis products rather than as original research. It is one of 38 DIRDs produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP) between 2009 and 2011. Because AAWSAP’s scope permitted a broad range of supporting topics, not every DIRD in the series directly concerns aerospace systems or future threat assessment. The following summary reflects the DIRD’s scope and framing at the time of writing and should not be read as implying current validation of the concepts discussed. This DIRD describes “programmable matter” as smart materials whose properties can be changed on command, potentially allowing spacecraft components to change function through software updates rather than physical repair or replacement. The report suggests that such materials could someday enable adjustable sensors, smart windows, heat control, energy collection, active camouflage, and systems that switch between different functions, making spacecraft more flexible and adaptable. At the same time, it presents the idea as highly speculative and emphasizes major technical obstacles, including manufacturing at extremely small scales, shielding against radiation and electromagnetic interference, managing temperature effects, reducing component failures, and preventing hacking or malicious control. Overall, the document presents programmable matter as a promising long-term concept over the next 50 years, while judging that simpler near-term uses such as smart windows and energy-saving surface materials are far more realistic than the more ambitious aerospace applications.

The summary above is sourced from the released file metadata as published to war.gov. The analysis sections below are original to this tracker.

Text of the document

Machine-extracted from the PDF war.gov published (its text layer or OCR), so expect errors, especially in names, numbers and handwriting; the PDF is the authoritative copy. Lines that did not extract as readable text are left out. Showing about 1000 words from pages 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of 20.

PAGE 2

Aerospace Applications of Programmable Matter Prepared by: Acquisition Support Division (DW0-3) Defense Warning Office Directorate for Analysis Defense I ntelligence Agency AAP Person 90 Administrative Note COPYRIGHT WARNING: Further dissemination of the photographs in this publication is not authorized. This product is one in a series of advanced technology reports produced in FY 2009 under the Defense Intelligence Agency, Defense Warning Office's Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA}.,..,i..i.~u.u.u.....:...w.i..u.u~i..i,....w.i....cUestions pertaining to this document should be addressed to AAP Person 1 AAWSA Program Manager, Defense Intelligence Agency, ATTN: CLAR DWO-3, Bldg 6000, Washington,

PAGE 3

Four Kinds of Atoms .................................................................,...........,................... 1 Photonics and Metamaterials ............................................................................. 3 "Impossible" Materials........................................................................................... 5 Advantages of Dynamic Materials ................................................................................... 5 Early Commercialization of Smart Materials ........................................................... 8 Advanced Concepts in Programmable Materials ................................................... 12 Scenario for Possible Applications ................................................................................. 13 1. Energy Levels of a Metal and a Semiconductor................................................,,, 2 5. Assorted views of RavenWindow and RavenLight Filters in the Cold (Transparent) and Hot (Reflective} State........................................................... 8 6. RavenWindow Smart Window Film Performance vs. Leading Incumbent Window 1. Daily Household Energy Consumption (USA, 1993-1997)................................. 11

PAGE 4

Aerospace Applications of Programmable Matter For the owners of a $100 million satellite-a TV broadcast satellite, for example-avoiding bankruptcy often depends on the spacecraft's continued good health until its scheduled replacement is in orbit. Unfortunately, numerous failure modes are possible, including blown fuses, failed sensors, and browned-out solar arrays. The common trait of most such failures is that they cannot be repaired from the ground. In addition, it is not typically possible to repurpose a spacecraft or its components for new services that no one foresaw at the time of manufacture. Either way, a new satellite is required. However, when sensors, filters, emitters, and photovoltaic solar panels are made of Programmable Matter smart materials, the solution to a component failure or new mission requirement might be as simple as a software update. Other advantages of dynamic materials include advanced energy management and energy scavenging from a variety of sources. Smart materials can even create new defensive capabilities, such as chameleon-style camouflage, deflection of laser beams, and even outright invisibility. If it becomes possible to change the properties of certain materials on demand, based on remotely triggered instructions, the benefits for spacecraft-both crewed and autonomous-will be considerable. This white paper-by no means an exhaustive reference-is intended to serve as a primer on the principles behind smart materials and their possible aerospace applications over the next

PAGE 5

Four Kinds of Atoms All matter is made of atoms and derives its properties, in part, from the fact that atoms are discrete objects yet are so small and so close together that light waves cannot "see" them individually. By extension, neither can electric and magnetic fields. To a photon, or to a large electrical current, matter appears to be made up of continuous substances rather than discrete building blocks. This fact is critically important in understanding the optical, electrical, and even thermal properties of materials. Equally important are the discoveries of recent decades, showing at least four different kinds of "atoms" that meet this same general description. NATURAL ATOMS Natural atoms are the 92 elements of the periodic table. Actually there are more, but the rest have unstable nuclei that will eventually fly apart Into smaller atoms and loose subatomic particles that can damage the materials around them. For engineering purposes, this makes them unreliable building blocks. However, 92 building blocks allow for a staggering number of combinations, and all the materials with which we are familiar-natural ones like coal and diamonds, ancient ones like bronze and glass, and modern ones like silicon carbide and gallium arsenide-are merely "Tinkertoy" sculptures of these natural atoms. QUANTUM DOTS A quantum dot is a very small grouping of tightly confined electrons whose collective behavior resembles that of a natural atom. For this reason, quantum dots are sometimes known as "artificial atoms." To describe how this trick is accomplished, it is first necessary to talk about electrons and how they behave. Most materials are either conductors, which permit the free flow of electrons, or insulators, which resist it. Semiconductors are insulators that are capable of conducting electrons above a certain threshold energy-a useful trick that makes integrated circuits and other electronics possible. The most familiar semiconductor is silicon, which is used to make the vast majority of microchips found in main component of sand and rocks, it is readily available and relatively inexpensive. In addition, when melted, purified, and hardened into sheets, silicon dioxide serves as one of our familiar insulators and building materials: glass. Unlike most other semiconductors, silicon is also nontoxic. The electrical properties of a semiconductor like silicon are of course fixed by the laws of physics. Atoms hold electrons in shells that increase in size, capacity, and potential energy the farther they are from the nucleus. "Valence" electrons are found in full (or nearly full) shells, where there are few empty spaces through which electrons can move. These electrons tend to stay at home, so their levels exhibit a large electrical resistance and do not permit electricity to flow. "Conduction" electrons are found in shells that are more than half-empty and have lots of open space, enabling electrons to travel freely through them and move easily from one atom to another. Between these layers is a "band gap" of forbidden energies. Here, there exist no electrons at all-ever.

PAGE 6

UNCLASSIFIED// FOR OFFICIAL USE 01\Lf Conduction Band z Conduction Band w Band Gap a: Valence Band Metal Semiconductor Figure 1. Energy Levels of a Metal and a Semiconductor. In a metal, many electrons reside in the conduction band and can be pushed to neighboring atoms with only a tiny addition of thermal or electrical energy. In a semiconductor, enough energy must first be added to excite the electron out of the valence band, across the band gap, and into the conduction band. Thus, to conduct electricity, semiconductors require much higher voltages and temperatures than do metals. Electrons below the band gap of a semiconductor behave as though they were in an

Where this file fits in the PURSUE archive

This file is one of DoD's 282 files in the Trump PURSUE disclosure. Within the DoD agency block it ranks #234 of 282 by Anomalousness Index. Across the entire 478-file archive it ranks #409 of 478.

That places it in the lower-scoring band of the archive (409 of 478 by score), typical of investigative-record style files where the report is paper-based rather than instrumented.

Anomalousness Index: 53/100

This is a reference document, not an encounter report, so the index has no encounter to measure here. The value above is the rubric's default for a document that describes no event, shown so every file in the archive can be ranked the same way. Not a probability of extraterrestrial origin - that number is not honestly computable from the released files and this tracker refuses to publish it.

🤖 AI-ASSISTED SCORING · methodology

The six rubric components break down for this file as follows. Each component has a weighted contribution to the final score; the per-component explanation below describes what this file's particular value on that component means in the rubric's framework.

sensor quality (eyewitness only) 30 × 0.25 = 7.5

This file is a reference document, not an observation, so no sensor, camera, or witness captured anything. The rubric's sensor axis has no not-applicable option, so a document with no instrument record sits on its lowest tier by default.

witness credibility (military personnel) 80 × 0.2 = 16.0

There is no witness: this is a document released by the Department of War, not a first-hand account. The rubric assigns this axis from the originating body, so the value reflects the source of the record, not anyone's testimony.

corroboration (single witness instrument) 60 × 0.2 = 12.0

Nothing is being corroborated, because the file does not report an event. Like every file in the archive it takes the rubric's single-source default.

kinematic anomaly (no kinematic data) 30 × 0.15 = 4.5

The file describes no object and no motion, so the kinematic axis takes the archive-wide 'no kinematic data' default.

mundane explanation available (weak mundane candidate) 70 × 0.1 = 7.0

Every file in the archive scores this tier. For a document that describes no event it carries no information about the record at all.

official disposition (unresolved no review) 60 × 0.1 = 6.0

The rubric's default for the file's release status (files released with redactions are catalogued as unresolved, unredacted ones as open). For a document that reports no event this describes how the file was released, not anything that happened.

Bottom line on the score: the 53/100 is the rubric's default for a document that reports no encounter, so it is not a finding about any event and should not be compared with the scores of sighting reports. For the full per-axis weights and the rubric JSON, see /methodology.

Related files in DoD

Other PURSUE files in the same category, ranked by Anomalousness Index.

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR024, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2023

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR072, "ADMINISTRATIVE REVISION: IIR 1777 J0032 22 Kazakhstan - UAP in the vicinit…

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR106, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2020

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR108, Unresolved UAP Report, Western United States, 2020

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR109, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2015

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR110, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2020

BROWSE ALL 478 FILES →

Verification

SHA-256:

372ce27196ee34604096282d74c5ce5cbcaec8c63a56fdb6fcc934f3db215eff

This hash is the SHA-256 of the file body war.gov served on the verification date above. War.gov has re-processed some file bodies since first release (re-compression + OCR, no content removed - see /changes); we re-verify and record the change rather than silently serve a stale hash. How to check this yourself →

Source: https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/sept-18/release-06/assets/DOW-UAP-D118_AAWSAP-DIRD-Aerospace-Applications-of-Programmable-Matter-December-14-2009.pdf

📡 Subscribe via RSS 🔔 Watch on GitHub