DOW-UAP-D119, AAWSAP DIRD, Biomaterials, January 2010
This document is a Defense Intelligence Reference Document (DIRD), a technical reference format used by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to capture baseline knowledge on a specific topic for later analytic use. DIRDs are best understood as reference and synthesis products rather than as original research. It is one of 38 DIRDs produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP) between 2009 and 2011. Because AAWSAP’s scope permitted a broad range of supporting topics, not every DIRD in the series directly concerns aerospace systems or future threat assessment. The following summary reflects the DIRD’s scope and framing at the time of writing and should not be read as implying current validation of the concepts discussed. This DIRD is a broad survey of biomaterials, including metals, polymers, ceramics, glasses, and composites designed to interact with living tissue, and argues that their value depends mainly on biocompatibility, reliability, and careful matching of material properties to specific medical uses. The report reviews major application areas including biosensors, implants, cardiovascular devices, contact lenses, drug delivery systems, tissue constructs, titanium devices, and dialysis membranes, emphasizing that no single biomaterial works best in every setting. Its overall conclusion is that biomaterials are already foundational to a large medical-device industry and save or improve millions of lives, but that progress tends to be slow because safety testing is stringent; as a result, most advances come from improved ways of applying established materials such as silicone, Teflon, biodegradable polymers, ceramics, and titanium in new devices and clinical settings rather than from radically new substances.
The summary above is sourced from the released file metadata as published to war.gov. The analysis sections below are original to this tracker.
Text of the document
Machine-extracted from the PDF war.gov published (its text layer or OCR), so expect errors, especially in names, numbers and handwriting; the PDF is the authoritative copy. Lines that did not extract as readable text are left out. Showing about 994 words from pages 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 of 32.
PAGE 2
Prepared by: Acquisition Support Division (DW0-3) Defense Warning Office Directorate for Analysis Defense Intelligence Agency AAP Person 65 Administrative Note COPYRIGHT WARNING: Further dissemination of the photographs in this publication is not authorized. This product is one in a series of advanced technology reports produced in FY 2009 under the Defense Intelligence Agency, Defense Warning Office's Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA Pro ram. Comments or uestions pertaining to this document should be addressed t AAP Person 1 AAWSA Program Manager, Defense Intelligence Agency, ATTN: CLAR/DWO-3, Bldg 6000, Washington,
PAGE 3
Importance of Biocompatibility .........................................................................vii Science of Biomaterials .....................................................................................vii Biomaterials for Biosensors ................................................................................... 1 Biomaterials for Biomedicine ................................................................................. 2 Silicone Chemistry.............................................................................................. 4 Silicone in Biomedical Products.......................................................................... 4 Biodegradable Polymers..................................................................................... 7 Polylactic Acid and Polyglycolic Acid .................................................................. 8 Polyethylene Glycol or Polyethylene Oxide....................................................... 10 Titanium - Hip and Knee Joints ........................................................................ 11 Tissue Constructs as Biomaterials ...................................................................... 13 Cardiovascular Biomaterials............................................................................. 15 Stent Biomaterials............................................................................................ 18 Drug Delivery Polymers.................................................................................... 20 Medical Titanium as a Biomaterial.................................................................... 22
PAGE 4
Biomaterials in Dialysis .................................................................................... 24 Summary and Recommendations ......................................................................... 25 Figure 1. Biomaterial Applications in Medical Devices ............................................vi Figure 2. Common Medical Devices That Use Biomaterials ...................................viii Figure 3. Biomaterials Such as Polycarbonates, Cellulose, and Silicones Used in Membranes for Sensors, Dialyzers, and Oxygenators .............................. 1 Figure 4. Photograph of Silicone (polydimethyllsiloxane) Biomedical Implants Used in Breast Reconstructive Surgery ................................................... 3 Figure 7. Silicone Sheets Used Under the Skin as a Physical Supporting Layer for Repair of Scar Tissue ............................................................................... 5 Figure 9. Expanded PTFE (Gore-Tex or ePTFE) Used in Lip Implants...................... 7 Figure 10. Biodegradable Polymers........................................................................ 7 Figure 11. Structure of Polylactic Acid (a Biodegradable Polymer) ........................ 9 Figure 12. Biodegradable PLA as an Antiadhesion Barrier after Open-Heart Figure 13. Biodegradable Polymers Based on Copolymers of Polylactic Acid and Polyethylene Glycol (Polysciences Inc) ............................................... 10 Figure 14. Dots of Hydrogel.................................................................................. 10 Figure 15. Various Titanium Components Used in Hip Joint Replacement ............ 11 Figure 16. Hydroxyapatite Porous Bone-Like Structure After Commercial Figure 17. Bioceramic Used in Artificial Hip Replacement Component.................. 12 Figure 18. Computer-Based Sculpted Ceramic Teeth ............................................ 13 Figure 20. Biodegradable Material CSLG Deposited in a Honeycomb Structure to Allow Infiltration by Living Cells While in a Submerged Cell Culture ... 15 Figure 21. Some of the More Popular Biomedical Devices and Duration of Their Blood Contact...................................................................................... 16 Figure 22. Gore Medical Teflon Foam Used in Vascular Grafts .............................. 16 Figure 23. Illustration of Treatment of an Atrial Septal Defect Using a Teflon-Based Product Manufactured by Gore, Inc............................... 17 Figure 24. Stainless Steel and Teflon Bjork Shiley Heart Valve ............................ 18 Figure 25. Illustration of Stent Placement ........................................................... 18 Figure 27. Contact Lens........................................................................................ 20 Figure 28. Schematic Representation of Biodegradable (Bioerodible) Drug Figure 29. Photomicrograph of Titanium Metal (Appears Black in This Photo) in an Intimate Integration With Living Bone ....................................... 23 Figure 30. Illustration (Left) and Photograph (Right) of a Blood Dialyzer as Used in Medicine ................................................................................. 24 Figure 31. Cuprophane Membrane Passes Blood Waste Products (Violet and Orange Dots) Through Pores and Blocks Passage of Red Blood Cells .. 25
PAGE 5
Biomaterials are metals, ceramics, polymers, glasses, carbons, and composite materials intended to interface with biological systems. They are often used to treat, augment, or replace bodily tissues, organs, or functions. Such materials are used in various forms, including molded or machined parts, coatings, fibers, films, foams, and fabrics. Biomaterials are usually nonliving, but recent definitions also include living skin and tissues produced in culture. A biocompatible material is different from a biological material produced by a biological system, such as bone. Artificial hips, vascular stents, artificial pacemakers, and catheters are all made of biocompatible materials that typically have a synthetic origin. An extraordinarily wide range of medical devices are made from biomaterials. Figure 1 shows some representative examples of medical devices that use biomaterials. Finger joint Breast implant Heart valve Hip j int tifi ial heart Figure 1. Biomaterial Applications in Medical Devices Encompassing elements of medicine, biology, chemistry, and materials science, biomaterials science has experienced steady and strong growth over its approximately half-century history. Although biomaterials are used primarily for medical applications, they are also used to grow cells in culture, to assay for blood proteins in the clinical UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY
PAGE 6
laboratory, in processing biomolecules in biotechnology, for fertility regulation implants in cattle, in diagnostic gene arrays, in the aquaculture of oysters, and for investigational cell-silicon "biochips." The common thread in these applications is the interaction between biological systems and synthetic or modified natural materials. Biomimetic materials, in contrast, are not made by living organisms but have compositions and properties similar to materials made by living organisms. For example, the calcium hydroxyapatite coating found on many artificial hips-used as metal-bone interface cement to make it easier to attach implants to bone-is similar to the coating found in mollusk shells. IMPORTANCE OF BIOCOMPATIBILITY Biocompatibility is an important issue in biomedical implants and sensors. A material-tissue interaction that results from implanting a foreign object in the body is a major obstacle to developing stable and long-term implantable devices and sensors. The processes that occur when sensors are placed in the complex living environment of the human body are sometimes known as biofouling. In biofouling, the physical or chemically sensitive portion of the sensor interface becomes coated with proteins, blood-formed elements, adherent immunological cells, and sometimes forms of scar tissue that tend to isolate the sensor from the rest of the body environment. This response of tissue is a foreign body reaction to any object introduced in tissue that does not express surface characteristics that identify it as part of the host tissues. Experiences of many investigators (more than 600 reported studies since 1996) with the biocompatibility of biomaterials related to the function of implanted biosensors have been poor such that many companies have abandoned implantable sensor devices altogether. Rather, the recent trend in medical biosensors is toward placing them outside the body. Newer sensors are often based on optical principles in an effort to obviate the biocompatibility and
Where this file fits in the PURSUE archive
This file is one of DoD's 282 files in the Trump PURSUE disclosure. Within the DoD agency block it ranks #235 of 282 by Anomalousness Index. Across the entire 478-file archive it ranks #410 of 478.
That places it in the lower-scoring band of the archive (410 of 478 by score), typical of investigative-record style files where the report is paper-based rather than instrumented.
Anomalousness Index: 53/100
This is a reference document, not an encounter report, so the index has no encounter to measure here. The value above is the rubric's default for a document that describes no event, shown so every file in the archive can be ranked the same way. Not a probability of extraterrestrial origin - that number is not honestly computable from the released files and this tracker refuses to publish it.
🤖 AI-ASSISTED SCORING · methodology
The six rubric components break down for this file as follows. Each component has a weighted contribution to the final score; the per-component explanation below describes what this file's particular value on that component means in the rubric's framework.
This file is a reference document, not an observation, so no sensor, camera, or witness captured anything. The rubric's sensor axis has no not-applicable option, so a document with no instrument record sits on its lowest tier by default.
There is no witness: this is a document released by the Department of War, not a first-hand account. The rubric assigns this axis from the originating body, so the value reflects the source of the record, not anyone's testimony.
Nothing is being corroborated, because the file does not report an event. Like every file in the archive it takes the rubric's single-source default.
The file describes no object and no motion, so the kinematic axis takes the archive-wide 'no kinematic data' default.
Every file in the archive scores this tier. For a document that describes no event it carries no information about the record at all.
The rubric's default for the file's release status (files released with redactions are catalogued as unresolved, unredacted ones as open). For a document that reports no event this describes how the file was released, not anything that happened.
Bottom line on the score: the 53/100 is the rubric's default for a document that reports no encounter, so it is not a finding about any event and should not be compared with the scores of sighting reports. For the full per-axis weights and the rubric JSON, see /methodology.
Related files in DoD
Other PURSUE files in the same category, ranked by Anomalousness Index.
DOW-UAP-PR024, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2023
DOW-UAP-PR072, "ADMINISTRATIVE REVISION: IIR 1777 J0032 22 Kazakhstan - UAP in the vicinit…
DOW-UAP-PR106, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2020
DOW-UAP-PR108, Unresolved UAP Report, Western United States, 2020
DOW-UAP-PR109, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2015
DOW-UAP-PR110, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2020
Verification
SHA-256:
This hash is the SHA-256 of the file body war.gov served on the verification date above. War.gov has re-processed some file bodies since first release (re-compression + OCR, no content removed - see /changes); we re-verify and record the change rather than silently serve a stale hash. How to check this yourself →