DOW-UAP-D121, AAWSAP DIRD, Pulsed High-Power Microwave Source Technology, January 2010

53
⬇ Download HD (53.0 MB)
SHARE Reddit X Facebook HN Email
Agency
DoD
Category
military
Type
PDF
Event Date
1/28/2010
Size
53.0 MB
Original Filename
DOW-UAP-D121_AAWSAP-DIRD-Pulsed-High-Power-Microwave-Source-Technology-January-28-2010.pdf
Location
Las Vegas, Nevada
Status
REDACTED

This document is a Defense Intelligence Reference Document (DIRD), a technical reference format used by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to capture baseline knowledge on a specific topic for later analytic use. DIRDs are best understood as reference and synthesis products rather than as original research. It is one of 38 DIRDs produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP) between 2009 and 2011. Because AAWSAP’s scope permitted a broad range of supporting topics, not every DIRD in the series directly concerns aerospace systems or future threat assessment. The following summary reflects the DIRD’s scope and framing at the time of writing and should not be read as implying current validation of the concepts discussed. This DIRD surveys pulsed high-power microwave (HPM) source technology and argues that such systems remain of military interest because they can disrupt or damage electronic systems with short, intense electromagnetic pulses. The report reviews the main source types and the supporting technologies they depend on, including high-voltage insulation, switching, cathode materials, antennas, and pulse-power generation. It emphasizes the difficulty of building systems that are compact, efficient, and practical to field, since short pulse durations, antenna size, heating, detectability, and beam or signal quality all impose hard engineering limits. Its overall conclusion is that the technology has significant potential military value, but that further progress depends on advances in cathodes, predictive modeling, high-speed high-voltage switching, and low-loss insulation, while compact ultrawideband systems will remain difficult because of basic physical constraints on antenna design.

The summary above is sourced from the released file metadata as published to war.gov. The analysis sections below are original to this tracker.

Text of the document

Machine-extracted from the PDF war.gov published (its text layer or OCR), so expect errors, especially in names, numbers and handwriting; the PDF is the authoritative copy. Lines that did not extract as readable text are left out. Showing about 989 words from pages 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 of 37.

PAGE 2

Pulsed High-Power Microwave Source Technology Prepared by: Acquisition Support Division (DW0-3) Defense Warning Office Directorate for Analysis Defense Intelligence Agency AAP Person 64 Administrative Note COPYRIGHT WARNING: Further dissemination of the photographs in this publication is not authorized. This product is one in a series of advanced technology reports produced in FY 2009 under the Defense Intelligence Agency, Defense Warning Office's Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program. Comments or questions pertaining to this document should be addressed to !AAP Person 1 AAWSA Program Manager, Defense Intelligence Agency, ATTN: CLAR/DW0-3, Bldg 6000, Washington,

PAGE 3

Uniform Homogeneous....................................................................................... 2 Urethanes and Silicones ................................................................................. 4 Cesium Iodide Coated ...................................................................................... 10 High-Speed Liquid Switching............................................................................ 14 High-Voltage Pulse Sources ................................................................................. 15 Transformer Based Generators ........................................................................ 16

PAGE 4

Explosively Driven Generators ......................................................................... 16 Pulsed High-Power Microwave Sources................................................................ 17 Pulsed Electron Beam Sources ......................................................................... 17 Virtual Cathode Oscillators............................................................................... 18 The Phoenix HPM Source.................................................................................. 22 Narrowband Antennas...................................................................................... 25 Wideband and Ultrawideband Antennas........................................................... 27 Figure 1. Paschen Curve for Air ............................................................................ 13 Figure 2. Example of Marx Generator Circuit ........................................................ 16 Figure 4. Active Denial System With FLAPS Antenna ............................................ 20 Figure 5. H2 With Large TEM Horn and PGC Output.............................................. 21 Figure 6. Cross-Section Drawing of HS With Point Geometry Converter, Brewster Angle Window, and Extended-Ground-Plane Antenna ........................... 21 Figure 7. HS Output Section With the Point Geometry Converter Feeding an Extended-Ground-Plane Antenna Through a Brewster Angle Window ... 22 Figure 8. Phoenix Radiated Pulse at 8.5 Meters ................................................... 23 Figure 9. Phoenix Radiated Spectral Content ....................................................... 23

PAGE 5

Figure 11. Jolt Radiated Electric Field Waveform at 85 Meters ............................. 24 Figure 12. FLAPS Antenna With a Cross-Shorted Dipole Array ............................. 26 Figure 13. Mode Converter Vlasov Antenna and Vlasov Antenna Attached to a Table 1. Dielectric Properties of Some HPM Plastics............................................... 3 Table 2. Relative Spark Breakdown Strength of Gases ........................................... S

PAGE 6

Pulsed High-Power Microwave Source Technology This paper provides an overview of the major types of high-power microwave (HPM) sources and the critical technologies required to build them. Pulsed HPM technology has been of scientific and military interest for several decades. Originally, the interest focused on the area of high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) concerns. HEMP is produced when a nuclear weapon is detonated high above the earth's surface, creating gamma radiation that interacts with the atmosphere to create an intense electromagnetic (EM) energy field that is harmless to people as it radiates outward but can overload computer circuitry with effects similar to, but causing damage more swiftly than, a lightning strike. HEMP effects became fully known in 1962, when a high-altitude nuclear test (codenamed "Starfish Prime") over the Pacific Ocean disrupted radio stations and electronic equipment 800 miles away in Hawaii. The HEMP effect can span thousands of miles, depending on the altitude, design, and power of the nuclear burst. It is speculated that a single device detonated at high altitude over the central United States could affect the entire country, since the HEMP would be picked up by conductors, such as wires and power cables, acting as antennas to conduct the electrical energy into various electronic systems. This EM radiation was found to have field levels on the order of several hundreds of kilovolts per meter with onset or rise times of a few nanoseconds and a duration of nearly a microsecond. Fields of these magnitudes were found to have severe detrimental effects on numerous electrical systems and items, such as the power grid, automobiles, communications equipment, and aircraft. Much testing was done in the 1960s and 1970s to determine vulnerabilities and to find mitigation solutions. The HEMP is essentially a wideband microwave pulse, and several EMP simulators were devised and built for use in testing its effect on various electronic systems. In addition, several programs were established to investigate the possibility of generating and radiating other spectrums of EM radiation that may have some of these same effects without requiring a nuclear detonation. This was the impetus for the advancement of pulsed HPM technologies for weapons. HPM radiation is composed of shorter waveforms at higher frequencies than is HEMP, which makes it highly effective against electronic equipment and more difficult to harden against. Whereas HEMP weapons are large in scale and require a nuclear capability along with technology to launch high-altitude missiles, HPM weapons are smaller in scale, involve a much lower level of technology, and are within the capability of almost any state. HPMs can damage computers and electronics similar to the way HEMP can, although the effects are limited to a much shorter range. Technical accessibility, lower cost, and the vulnerability of U.S. electronic equipment could make small-scale HPM weapons attractive to terrorist groups. HPM devices are now categorized as directed-energy weapons.

PAGE 7

One major use of HPM by the military is for electronic attack, or what is referred to by the media as an "ebomb." HPM sources developed for this purpose provide peak powers in excess of 10 gigawatts. The goal of such a weapon is to disable communications and computer systems prior to any troop movements and render the enemy unable to stage a response. The technology used to drive such sources has its roots in pulsed power, and for narrowband sources requires the use of tools that have been developed in the plasma physics community. Reliance on microprocessors that have an increasing density of circuits packaged onto each chip makes such systems ever-more vulnerable to HPM effects. As an example of the possible effects of HPM weapons, on 28 May 2001, a U.S. Commanche helicopter, flying in New York state while performing tests involving HPM weapons, was reported to have generated a low-level energy pulse that disrupted the Global Positioning System devices used to land commercial aircraft in Albany. The use of this type of weapon can be based on several scenarios, depending on the asset it will be used against. Sometimes, it may only be necessary to upset a data bus transfer to produce a success; other times, success may not

Where this file fits in the PURSUE archive

This file is one of DoD's 282 files in the Trump PURSUE disclosure. Within the DoD agency block it ranks #237 of 282 by Anomalousness Index. Across the entire 478-file archive it ranks #412 of 478.

That places it in the lower-scoring band of the archive (412 of 478 by score), typical of investigative-record style files where the report is paper-based rather than instrumented.

Anomalousness Index: 53/100

This is a reference document, not an encounter report, so the index has no encounter to measure here. The value above is the rubric's default for a document that describes no event, shown so every file in the archive can be ranked the same way. Not a probability of extraterrestrial origin - that number is not honestly computable from the released files and this tracker refuses to publish it.

🤖 AI-ASSISTED SCORING · methodology

The six rubric components break down for this file as follows. Each component has a weighted contribution to the final score; the per-component explanation below describes what this file's particular value on that component means in the rubric's framework.

sensor quality (eyewitness only) 30 × 0.25 = 7.5

This file is a reference document, not an observation, so no sensor, camera, or witness captured anything. The rubric's sensor axis has no not-applicable option, so a document with no instrument record sits on its lowest tier by default.

witness credibility (military personnel) 80 × 0.2 = 16.0

There is no witness: this is a document released by the Department of War, not a first-hand account. The rubric assigns this axis from the originating body, so the value reflects the source of the record, not anyone's testimony.

corroboration (single witness instrument) 60 × 0.2 = 12.0

Nothing is being corroborated, because the file does not report an event. Like every file in the archive it takes the rubric's single-source default.

kinematic anomaly (no kinematic data) 30 × 0.15 = 4.5

The file describes no object and no motion, so the kinematic axis takes the archive-wide 'no kinematic data' default.

mundane explanation available (weak mundane candidate) 70 × 0.1 = 7.0

Every file in the archive scores this tier. For a document that describes no event it carries no information about the record at all.

official disposition (unresolved no review) 60 × 0.1 = 6.0

The rubric's default for the file's release status (files released with redactions are catalogued as unresolved, unredacted ones as open). For a document that reports no event this describes how the file was released, not anything that happened.

Bottom line on the score: the 53/100 is the rubric's default for a document that reports no encounter, so it is not a finding about any event and should not be compared with the scores of sighting reports. For the full per-axis weights and the rubric JSON, see /methodology.

Related files in DoD

Other PURSUE files in the same category, ranked by Anomalousness Index.

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR024, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2023

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR072, "ADMINISTRATIVE REVISION: IIR 1777 J0032 22 Kazakhstan - UAP in the vicinit…

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR106, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2020

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR108, Unresolved UAP Report, Western United States, 2020

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR109, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2015

DoD · VIDEO SCORE 68

DOW-UAP-PR110, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2020

BROWSE ALL 478 FILES →

Verification

SHA-256:

78f1b9b7fb7fb967f6b3e5f05bb03e26dff864b32b8d4d5ce12e02da12e8378b

This hash is the SHA-256 of the file body war.gov served on the verification date above. War.gov has re-processed some file bodies since first release (re-compression + OCR, no content removed - see /changes); we re-verify and record the change rather than silently serve a stale hash. How to check this yourself →

Source: https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/sept-18/release-06/assets/DOW-UAP-D121_AAWSAP-DIRD-Pulsed-High-Power-Microwave-Source-Technology-January-28-2010.pdf

📡 Subscribe via RSS 🔔 Watch on GitHub