DOW-UAP-D136, AAWSAP DIRD, Biosensors and BioMEMS: A Survey of the Present Field, March 2010
This document is a Defense Intelligence Reference Document (DIRD), a technical reference format used by the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) to capture baseline knowledge on a specific topic for later analytic use. DIRDs are best understood as reference and synthesis products rather than as original research. It is one of 38 DIRDs produced under the Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications Program (AAWSAP) between 2009 and 2011. Because AAWSAP’s scope permitted a broad range of supporting topics, not every DIRD in the series directly concerns aerospace systems or future threat assessment. The following summary reflects the DIRD’s scope and framing at the time of writing and should not be read as implying current validation of the concepts discussed. This DIRD surveys biosensors and BioMEMS, a broad class of miniature biomedical devices that combine microscale engineering with sensing, fluid handling, stimulation, or drug-delivery functions. The report reviews major application areas including implantable blood-chemistry sensors, neural interfaces, neurostimulation, drug-delivery pumps, microfluidic systems, and emerging nanoscale extensions of the field, while emphasizing that miniaturization can improve sensitivity and enable functions that are difficult or impossible at larger scales. However, it also makes clear that practical development is constrained by biocompatibility, long-term stability, sensor drift, device degradation inside the body, and the high regulatory burden associated with implantable medical systems. The document presents BioMEMS as a rapidly growing and productive field whose future advances are likely to come through continued improvements in fabrication, materials, and reliability.
The summary above is sourced from the released file metadata as published to war.gov. The analysis sections below are original to this tracker.
Text of the document
Machine-extracted from the PDF war.gov published (its text layer or OCR), so expect errors, especially in names, numbers and handwriting; the PDF is the authoritative copy. Lines that did not extract as readable text are left out. Showing about 992 words from pages 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 of 45.
PAGE 2
Biosensors and BioMEMS: A Survey of the Present Field Prepared by: Acquisition Support Division (DW0-3) Defense Warning Office Directorate for Analysis Defense Intelligence Agency AAP Person 65 Administrative Note COPYRIGHT WARNING: Further dissemination of the photographs in this publication is not authorized. This product is one in a series of advanced technology reports produced in FY 2009 under t he Defense Intelligence Agency, Defense Warning Office's Advanced Aerospace Weapon System Applications (AAWSA) Program. Comments or uestions pertaining to this document should be addressed to!AAP Person 1 , AAWSA Program Manager, Defense Intelligence Agency, ATTN: CLAR/DWO-3, Bldg 6000, Washington,
PAGE 3
Introduction ........................................................................................................... vi What is BioMEMS? .................................................................................................. 1 Characteristics of BioMEMS ................................................................................ 2 Categories of BioMEMS ....................................................................................... 3 Brain-Implanted BioMEMS Micromachine Neuroelectrodes ................................ 4 BioMEMS Implantable Sensors ............................................................................. 10 MEMS Blood Glucose Sensors ............................................................................... 13 Commercial Blood Glucose Sensors .................................................................. 14 Enzyme-Based Biosensors................................................................................ 14 Thermopile Implantable Glucose Sensors ........................................................ 15 Neuroengineering by BioMEMS............................................................................. 20 Bioelectric Events............................................................................................. 20 Bionics and Neurointerfaces................................................................................. 22 Bioelectrodes and BioMEMS ............................................................................. 22 Microelectrode Array Fabrication ..................................................................... 24 Polymer BioMEMS Electrodes ........................................................................... 26 Retinal Devices Using BioMEMS........................................................................ 27 Microscale in Therapeutic Neurostimulation..................................................... 30 MEMS in Microfluidics........................................................................................... 32
PAGE 4
NASA Space Applications for Microfluidic Systems ........................................... 34 Microcantilever MEMs Sensors ............................................................................. 36 Figure 1. Varieties of BioMEMS and Sensors........................................................... 2 Figure 2. Functional MEMS Micromachines Attached to Sensing Bioelectrodes....... 5 Figure 3. Schematic Diagram of a MEMS Motor Complete With a Method of Converting Oscillatory Motion to Linear Motion ....................................... 5 Figure 4. Illustration of the Basic Physical Principle of the BioMEMS Motor ........... 6 Figure 5. Close-up Views of the Micro-Motor Gear .................................................. 6 Figure 6. An Insulin MEMS Pump............................................................................ 8 Figure 7. An ISFET (Ion Sensitive Field Effect Transistor) Needle-Type pH Sensor for Monitoring Tissue Physiologic Status ............................................... 11 Figure 9. Control of an Insulin-Delivery System by an Implantable Glucose Figure 11. An Experimental MEMS Blood Glucose Sensor ..................................... 15 Figure 14. Illustration of the Thermocouple Principle .......................................... 18 Figure 15. Thermopile Glucose Sensor (left) With Functional Illustration (right) are Made Using Photolithographic Techniques .................................... 19 Figure 16. Photograph and Illustration of the Thermopile Glucose Sensor in a Figure 17. A MEMS Biopotential Electrode System................................................ 20 Figure 18. A Neural Cell Showing Dendritic Inter-Connections That are Electrically Active With Other Cells........................................................................ 21 Figure 20. Scanning Electron Micrograph of a Brain Electrode Array Manufactured From Titanium and Produced by a Process of Electrodischarge Figure 21. Scanning Electron Micrograph of a 1141 Electrode Array Made to Be Inserted Into the Surface of the Human Brain .................................... 25 Figure 22. Polymer Based Cortical Penetrating Neuroelectrodes Made by Processes of Thin Film Deposition and RF Etching ............................................... 26 Figure 23. A MEMS Microelectrode Array Implanted Into the Cortex of a Rat Brain Figure 24. A Representation of the Retinal Prosthesis ......................................... 28 Figure 25. A BioMEMS Fabricated 4x4 Microelectrode Retinal Array..................... 28 Figure 26. An Illustration of the Retinal Neuroprosthesis Created by the Boston Figure 27. Power Transfer by Magnetic Induction to an Implanted BioMEMS Retinal Figure 28. A New Generation of Implantable Neurostimulation Devices Can Pass Through the Lumen of a Syringe Needle.............................................. 31 Figure 29. Illustration of the Internal Construction of the Ultrasound Powered Neurostimulator Developed at ASU ..................................................... 32
PAGE 5
Figure 30. Microfluidics in Glass........................................................................... 32 Figure 31. Commercial Lab-Chip Devices That Allow Analysis for Biomarkers of Various Diseases Using On-Chip Electrophoresis in Microscale........... 34 Figure 32. Design of an Automated Cell Culture System for NASA Space Applications Incorporating Microfluidics and Integrated Optical Figure 33. NASA Space Application of Microfluidic Cell Culture System Made by Figure 34. Principle of a Microcantilever That Bends When It is Loaded With an Figure 35. Scanning Electron Micrograph Showing a Cantilever Beam With a Single Vaccinia Virus Particle ......................................................................... 38 Figure 36. Antibodies Attached to a Cantilever Array Create Different Specificities to Substances in Blood That are Indicative of Cancer.......................... 38
PAGE 6
Biosensors and BioMEMS: A Survey of the Present Field Biomedical sensors and implantable devices employing micro electromechanical technology will be important to the future of biomedicine. Once just science fiction, the notion of a bionic man is now becoming a reality through the application of microscale technologies. Today it is not unusual to have a friend or family member who has an implantable device, such as a pacemaker, defibrillator, cochlear implant, biosensor, neurostimulator, or insulin pump. We have only seen the beginning of this technology development, and today's state-of-the-art implantable devices will be seen as crude and cumbersome tomorrow. With the rapid pace of development, it is probable that within the next two decades we will have as many medical treatments based on microdevices as there are pharmaceutical solutions today. This paper examines some of the most recent advances in the field, as well as the technologies that are likely to appear in the next few years.
PAGE 7
What is BioM EMS? BioMEMS stands for biomedical micro-_glectro-mechanical ~ystems. It is a name applied to biological and medical devices that are created using advanced fabrication processes that allow the devices to be very small relative to comparable devices produced by traditional techniques. BioMEMS devices can also exploit the microscale to provide new functions that are not practical or possible in large-scale devices. The name applies to an exceptionally wide variety of engineered devices that derive from electrical, mechanical, chemical, and molecular engineering. The name distinguishes these from nanoMEMS which are submicron in scale such as carbon nanotube structures. Recently BioMEMS has become something of a misnomer as many of the latest technologies are being designed and developed based on nanoscale technologies which are many times smaller than microscale technologies. While current devices are manufactured mostly on the microscale, many of the functioning parts and the materials they operate on are at the nanoscale level. NanoMEMS for biomedical applications are mostly carbon-based materials that have emerged as prime materials because of their favorable mechanical and electrical properties. Carbon-based nanostructures such as graphene exhibit a high Young's modulus (stiffness), high strength, low density, low friction and large surface area. The
Where this file fits in the PURSUE archive
This file is one of DoD's 282 files in the Trump PURSUE disclosure. Within the DoD agency block it ranks #252 of 282 by Anomalousness Index. Across the entire 478-file archive it ranks #427 of 478.
That places it in the lower-scoring band of the archive (427 of 478 by score), typical of investigative-record style files where the report is paper-based rather than instrumented.
Anomalousness Index: 53/100
This is a reference document, not an encounter report, so the index has no encounter to measure here. The value above is the rubric's default for a document that describes no event, shown so every file in the archive can be ranked the same way. Not a probability of extraterrestrial origin - that number is not honestly computable from the released files and this tracker refuses to publish it.
🤖 AI-ASSISTED SCORING · methodology
The six rubric components break down for this file as follows. Each component has a weighted contribution to the final score; the per-component explanation below describes what this file's particular value on that component means in the rubric's framework.
This file is a reference document, not an observation, so no sensor, camera, or witness captured anything. The rubric's sensor axis has no not-applicable option, so a document with no instrument record sits on its lowest tier by default.
There is no witness: this is a document released by the Department of War, not a first-hand account. The rubric assigns this axis from the originating body, so the value reflects the source of the record, not anyone's testimony.
Nothing is being corroborated, because the file does not report an event. Like every file in the archive it takes the rubric's single-source default.
The file describes no object and no motion, so the kinematic axis takes the archive-wide 'no kinematic data' default.
Every file in the archive scores this tier. For a document that describes no event it carries no information about the record at all.
The rubric's default for the file's release status (files released with redactions are catalogued as unresolved, unredacted ones as open). For a document that reports no event this describes how the file was released, not anything that happened.
Bottom line on the score: the 53/100 is the rubric's default for a document that reports no encounter, so it is not a finding about any event and should not be compared with the scores of sighting reports. For the full per-axis weights and the rubric JSON, see /methodology.
Related files in DoD
Other PURSUE files in the same category, ranked by Anomalousness Index.
DOW-UAP-PR024, Unresolved UAP Report, Middle East, 2023
DOW-UAP-PR072, "ADMINISTRATIVE REVISION: IIR 1777 J0032 22 Kazakhstan - UAP in the vicinit…
DOW-UAP-PR106, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2020
DOW-UAP-PR108, Unresolved UAP Report, Western United States, 2020
DOW-UAP-PR109, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2015
DOW-UAP-PR110, Unresolved UAP Report, Eastern United States, 2020
Verification
SHA-256:
This hash is the SHA-256 of the file body war.gov served on the verification date above. War.gov has re-processed some file bodies since first release (re-compression + OCR, no content removed - see /changes); we re-verify and record the change rather than silently serve a stale hash. How to check this yourself →